Concurrent/Consecutive with Unimposed Sentences

Setser v. United States, 2012 WL 1019970 (Mar. 28, 2012) (1) A district court has the discretion to order that a federal sentence run consecutively to an anticipated state sentence that has not yet been imposed; and (2) district court’s decision to require defendant to serve sentence consecutive to one anticipated state sentence and concurrent with another anticipated state sentence was not rendered unreasonable when state court decided to impose its two sentences concurrently.